2009 BMW 320 vs. 2013 Ford F-150
To start off, 2013 Ford F-150 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW 320 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford F-150 (355 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 2009 BMW 320. (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW 320.
Because 2013 Ford F-150 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford F-150 (515 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 320. (190 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2013 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 320 | 2013 Ford F-150 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 320 | F-150 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 355 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 515 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 6195 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2464 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3988 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 136 L |