2009 BMW 320 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW 320 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 160 kg more than 2009 BMW 320.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (281 Nm @ 5600 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 320. (190 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 320 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | BMW | Mini |
Model | 320 | Countryman |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4133 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 47 L |