2009 BMW 323 vs. 1964 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2009 BMW 323 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 323 (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1964 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 1964 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1964 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 323 (230 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 323 | 1964 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 323 | CJ5 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2060 mm |