2009 BMW 325 vs. 2013 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2013 Jaguar XK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW 325 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XK (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 288 more horse power than 2009 BMW 325. (215 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW 325.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XK (625 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 325. (315 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 325.

Compare all specifications:

2009 BMW 325 2013 Jaguar XK
Make BMW Jaguar
Model 325 XK
Year Released 2009 2013
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 2494 cc 5000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 215 HP 503 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 315 Nm 625 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 5500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 92 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81 mm 93 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Top Speed 245 km/hour 250 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 7 seconds 4.8 seconds
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4530 mm 4794 mm
Vehicle Width 1430 mm 2032 mm
Vehicle Height 1820 mm 1322 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 2752 mm