2009 BMW 328 vs. 1951 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2009 BMW 328 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 328 (230 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1951 Cadillac 62. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 1951 Cadillac 62.
Because 2009 BMW 328 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW 328 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 328. (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 328 | 1951 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 328 | 62 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 5422 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 423 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.0:1 | 6.7:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3210 mm |