2009 BMW 328 vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2009 BMW 328 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 328 (231 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW 328 | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 328 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2996 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 231 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3300 mm |
