2009 BMW 328 vs. 1964 Citroen DS
To start off, 2009 BMW 328 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW 328 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 328 (231 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1964 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen DS.
Because 2009 BMW 328 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 328. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 328 (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Citroen DS. (144 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 328 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Citroen DS.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 328 | 1964 Citroen DS | |
Make | BMW | Citroen |
Model | 328 | DS |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 1911 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 231 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 65 L |