2009 BMW 328 vs. 1982 Chrysler E
To start off, 2009 BMW 328 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW 328 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 328 (230 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 2009 BMW 328 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 328. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 328 (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 328 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 328 | 1982 Chrysler E | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | 328 | E |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2630 mm |