2009 BMW 328 vs. 1983 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2009 BMW 328 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW 328 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 328 (231 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Because 2009 BMW 328 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 328. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 328 (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 328 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 328 | 1983 Ford Tempo | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 328 | Tempo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 231 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2540 mm |