2009 BMW 328 vs. 1992 Mazda 626
To start off, 2009 BMW 328 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW 328 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 328 (230 HP) has 124 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 626. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 626.
Because 2009 BMW 328 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 328. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 328 (271 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 626. (157 Nm). This means 2009 BMW 328 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 328 | 1992 Mazda 626 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 328 | 626 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2620 mm |