2009 BMW 328 vs. 2003 MG TF
To start off, 2009 BMW 328 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG TF would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW 328 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 328 (230 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2003 MG TF. (158 HP @ 6900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 2003 MG TF.
Because 2009 BMW 328 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MG TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW 328 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 328 (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG TF. (174 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 328 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 328 | 2003 MG TF | |
Make | BMW | MG |
Model | 328 | TF |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |