2009 BMW 328 vs. 2003 MG TF
To start off, 2009 BMW 328 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG TF would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW 328 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 328 (230 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2003 MG TF. (115 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 2003 MG TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 328 (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG TF. (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 328 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 328 | 2003 MG TF | |
Make | BMW | MG |
Model | 328 | TF |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |