2009 BMW 328 vs. 2005 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2009 BMW 328 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW 328 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 328 (230 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo.
Because 2009 BMW 328 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW 328 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 328 (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo. (145 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 328 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 328 | 2005 Daewoo Rezzo | |
Make | BMW | Daewoo |
Model | 328 | Rezzo |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |