2009 BMW 328 vs. 2007 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2009 BMW 328 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Jeep Compass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Jeep Compass would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW 328 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 328 (230 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2007 Jeep Compass. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 2007 Jeep Compass.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jeep Compass (310 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 328. (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2007 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 328 | 2007 Jeep Compass | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 328 | Compass |
Year Released | 2009 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 1967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 51 L |