2009 BMW 330 vs. 1996 Ford Ka
To start off, 2009 BMW 330 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Ka would be higher. At 2,996 cc, 2009 BMW 330 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 330 (254 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1996 Ford Ka. (58 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 330 should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Ka.
Because 2009 BMW 330 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 330. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 330 (315 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Ka. (105 Nm). This means 2009 BMW 330 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 330 | 1996 Ford Ka | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 330 | Ka |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 1299 cc |
Horse Power | 254 HP | 58 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 105 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
Top Speed | 245 km/hour | 145 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 42 L |