2009 BMW 330 vs. 2003 Volvo V50
To start off, 2009 BMW 330 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Volvo V50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Volvo V50 would be higher. At 2,993 cc, 2009 BMW 330 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 330 (242 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2003 Volvo V50. (217 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 330 should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo V50.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 330 (521 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Volvo V50. (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 330 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Volvo V50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW 330 | 2003 Volvo V50 | |
| Make | BMW | Volvo |
| Model | 330 | V50 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2524 cc |
| Horse Power | 242 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 521 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 235 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.1 seconds | 6.9 seconds |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.3 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 62 L |
