2009 BMW 330 vs. 2004 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2009 BMW 330 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 3,698 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 330 (242 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Cherokee. (207 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 330 should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Cherokee.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 330 (521 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Cherokee. (312 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 330 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 330 | 2004 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 330 | Cherokee |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3698 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 521 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 90.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.1 seconds | 10.8 seconds |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.3 L/100km | 14.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 70 L |