2009 BMW 330 vs. 2004 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2009 BMW 330 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 2,993 cc, 2009 BMW 330 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 330 (242 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Wrangler. (150 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 330 should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Wrangler.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 330 (521 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Wrangler. (224 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 330 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 330 | 2004 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 330 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2499 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 521 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 101 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.3 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 72 L |