2009 BMW 330 vs. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2009 BMW 330 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2009 BMW 330. (254 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW 330.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW 330. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 330. (315 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 330.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 330 | 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 330 | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 4162 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 254 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 10.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3280 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 95 L |