2009 BMW 330 vs. 2008 Volkswagen Caravelle
To start off, 2009 BMW 330 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Volkswagen Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Volkswagen Caravelle would be higher. At 2,996 cc, 2009 BMW 330 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 BMW 330 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 330. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Caravelle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volkswagen Caravelle (340 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 330. (315 Nm). This means 2008 Volkswagen Caravelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 330.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW 330 | 2008 Volkswagen Caravelle | |
| Make | BMW | Volkswagen |
| Model | 330 | Caravelle |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2459 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 254 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 315 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 245 km/hour | 168 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.3 seconds | 15.3 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |
