2009 BMW 330 vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW 330. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW 330 would be higher. At 2,996 cc, 2009 BMW 330 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2009 BMW 330. (254 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW 330.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW 330. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XF (340 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 330. (315 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 330.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 330 | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | 330 | XF |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2995 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 254 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 340 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Top Speed | 245 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.3 seconds | 7.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2909 mm |