2009 BMW 330 vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW 330. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW 330 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (281 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2009 BMW 330. (254 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW 330.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW 330. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (353 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 330. (315 Nm). This means 2013 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 330.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 330 | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 330 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 3600 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 254 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 353 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4684 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1798 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 85 L |