2009 BMW 335 vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 2009 BMW 335 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW 335 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 335 (300 HP) has 192 more horse power than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 335 should accelerate faster than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 335 (407 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 335 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 335 | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | BMW | Reliant |
Model | 335 | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 82.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 38 L |