2009 BMW 335 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier
To start off, 2009 BMW 335 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier would be higher. At 2,496 cc, 2009 BMW 335 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 335 (215 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier. (120 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 335 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 335 (200 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier. (183 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 335 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier. 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier has automatic transmission and 2009 BMW 335 has manual transmission. 2009 BMW 335 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 335 | 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 335 | Cavalier |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 2190 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 57 L |