2009 BMW 335 vs. 2003 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2009 BMW 335 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,496 cc, 2009 BMW 335 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 335 (215 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 335 should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 335 (200 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 335 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 335 | 2003 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 335 | Tracker |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 1590 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2210 mm |