2009 BMW 335 vs. 2004 MG ZT-T
To start off, 2009 BMW 335 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MG ZT-T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MG ZT-T would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 335 (215 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2004 MG ZT-T. (187 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 335 should accelerate faster than 2004 MG ZT-T.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 MG ZT-T (250 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 335. (200 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2004 MG ZT-T will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 335.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 335 | 2004 MG ZT-T | |
Make | BMW | MG |
Model | 335 | ZT-T |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Top Speed | 240 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.9 seconds | 9 seconds |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 65 L |