2009 BMW 335 vs. 2005 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2009 BMW 335 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Suzuki Reno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Suzuki Reno would be higher. At 2,496 cc, 2009 BMW 335 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 335 (215 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2005 Suzuki Reno. (124 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 335 should accelerate faster than 2005 Suzuki Reno.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 335 (200 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki Reno. (179 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 335 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki Reno. 2005 Suzuki Reno has automatic transmission and 2009 BMW 335 has manual transmission. 2009 BMW 335 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Suzuki Reno will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 335 | 2005 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | BMW | Suzuki |
Model | 335 | Reno |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 55 L |