2009 BMW 335 vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW 335. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW 335 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (305 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2009 BMW 335. (215 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW 335.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Commander (454 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 335. (200 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 335. 2010 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2009 BMW 335 has manual transmission. 2009 BMW 335 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW 335 | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | 335 | Commander |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2496 cc | 4701 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5650 RPM |
| Torque | 200 Nm | 454 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3950 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 80 L |
