2009 BMW 335 vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW 335. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW 335 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 335 (215 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2010 Mazda BT-50. (141 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 335 should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda BT-50.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (330 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 335. (200 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 335.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 335 | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 335 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 2500 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Top Speed | 240 km/hour | 158 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.9 seconds | 12.5 seconds |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |