2009 BMW 525 vs. 1970 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2009 BMW 525 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Sixty (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2009 BMW 525. (215 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW 525. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 671 kg more than 2009 BMW 525. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW 525 | 1970 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 525 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5495 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 2196 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3390 mm |
