2009 BMW 528 vs. 1968 Triumph 2.5
To start off, 2009 BMW 528 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2.5 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW 528 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 528 (230 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2.5. (150 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 528 should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2.5.
Because 2009 BMW 528 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Triumph 2.5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW 528 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 528 (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2.5. (222 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 528 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2.5.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 528 | 1968 Triumph 2.5 | |
Make | BMW | Triumph |
Model | 528 | 2.5 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 222 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 64 L |