2009 BMW 528 vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 2009 BMW 528 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW 528 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 528 (230 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 528 should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 528 | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
Make | BMW | Caterham |
Model | 528 | 1700 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 1692 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 36 L |