2009 BMW 528 vs. 2012 Volkswagen Sharan

To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Sharan is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW 528. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW 528 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW 528 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 528 (230 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2012 Volkswagen Sharan. (113 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 528 should accelerate faster than 2012 Volkswagen Sharan.

Because 2009 BMW 528 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 528. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen Sharan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volkswagen Sharan (280 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 528. (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2012 Volkswagen Sharan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 528.

Compare all specifications:

2009 BMW 528 2012 Volkswagen Sharan
Make BMW Volkswagen
Model 528 Sharan
Year Released 2009 2012
Body Type Sedan Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2996 cc 2000 cc
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 230 HP 113 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 271 Nm 280 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 1750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4860 mm 4854 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1904 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1720 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2919 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 8.4 L/100km 4.9 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.1 L/100km 6.9 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.2 L/100km 5.6 L/100km