2009 BMW 535 vs. 1962 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2009 BMW 535 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW 535 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 535 (300 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 535 should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Because 2009 BMW 535 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW 535 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 535 (407 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 354 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 535 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 535 | 1962 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | BMW | DAF |
Model | 535 | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 53 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 85.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 7.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 33 L |