2009 BMW 535 vs. 2003 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2009 BMW 535 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 535 (300 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 535 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline.
Because 2009 BMW 535 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW 535 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 535 (407 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 535 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 535 | 2003 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 535 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3510 mm |