2009 BMW 650 vs. 1992 Chrysler TC
To start off, 2009 BMW 650 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 4,799 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW 650 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 650 (361 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler TC. (175 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 650 should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler TC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW 650 weights approximately 49 kg more than 1992 Chrysler TC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 BMW 650 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 650. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler TC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 650 (488 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chrysler TC. (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 650 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chrysler TC.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 650 | 1992 Chrysler TC | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | 650 | TC |
Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4799 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 488 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2370 mm |