2009 BMW 650 vs. 2006 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2009 BMW 650 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Holden Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Holden Caprice would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 650 (362 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2006 Holden Caprice. (344 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 650 should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Caprice.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 650. (490 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 650.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW 650 | 2006 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | 650 | Caprice |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4797 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 362 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 490 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 12.3 L/100km |
