2009 BMW 650 vs. 2008 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 BMW 650 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Citroen C-Crosser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Citroen C-Crosser would be higher. At 4,799 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW 650 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 650 (362 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 2008 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 650 should accelerate faster than 2008 Citroen C-Crosser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Citroen C-Crosser weights approximately 300 kg more than 2009 BMW 650.
Because 2008 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW 650. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 650 (490 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen C-Crosser. (380 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 650 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen C-Crosser.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 650 | 2008 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | BMW | Citroen |
Model | 650 | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4799 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 362 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 490 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 16.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6 seconds | 10.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |