2009 BMW 745 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2009 BMW 745 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 745 (325 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 745 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW 745 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1964 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 745 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 745 | 62 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4423 cc | 7028 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 2075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 79 L |