2009 BMW 750 vs. 2005 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2009 BMW 750 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 750 (363 HP) has 28 more horse power than 2005 GMC Yukon. (335 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 750 should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Yukon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Yukon weights approximately 564 kg more than 2009 BMW 750.
Because 2005 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW 750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Yukon (510 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 750. (490 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 750.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 750 | 2005 GMC Yukon | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | 750 | Yukon |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4799 cc | 5965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 363 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 490 Nm | 510 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 2514 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.9 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.4 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 98 L |