2009 BMW 750 vs. 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee

To start off, 2009 BMW 750 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 4,799 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW 750 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 750 (363 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (230 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 750 should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW 750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 750 (490 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (393 Nm). This means 2009 BMW 750 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Compare all specifications:

2009 BMW 750 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Make BMW Jeep
Model 750 Grand Cherokee
Year Released 2009 2005
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4799 cc 4703 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 363 HP 230 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 3800 RPM
Torque 490 Nm 393 Nm
Engine Bore Size 93 mm 93 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.3 mm 87 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 5190 mm 4750 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 3130 mm 2790 mm
Fuel Consumption City 16.9 L/100km 15.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.4 L/100km 13.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 78 L