2009 BMW M3 vs. 1942 Cadillac 60
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW M3 | 1942 Cadillac 60 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | M3 | 60 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1942 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3999 cc | 5671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 414 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3230 mm |
