2009 BMW M3 vs. 1951 Saab 92
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Saab 92 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 390 more horse power than 1951 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1951 Saab 92.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 1951 Saab 92 | |
Make | BMW | Saab |
Model | M3 | 92 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2480 mm |