2009 BMW M3 vs. 1954 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1954 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1954 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1954 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2009 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2009 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1954 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 1954 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | M3 | 62 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 5423 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 267 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3290 mm |