2009 BMW M3 vs. 1954 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 1954 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1954 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW M3 weights approximately 480 kg more than 1954 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW M3 | 1954 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | BMW | Maserati |
| Model | M3 | A6G |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 414 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 840 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2560 mm |
