2009 BMW M3 vs. 1962 Maserati 151
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Maserati 151. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Maserati 151 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1962 Maserati 151. (355 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Maserati 151.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Maserati 151 (487 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (295 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 1962 Maserati 151 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 1962 Maserati 151 | |
Make | BMW | Maserati |
Model | M3 | 151 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 3942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 355 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 295 Nm | 487 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2310 mm |