2009 BMW M3 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 280 kg more than 2009 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW M3 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | M3 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3999 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 414 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1810 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 79 L |
