2009 BMW M3 vs. 1963 Simca Ariane
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Simca Ariane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Simca Ariane would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 352 more horse power than 1963 Simca Ariane. (62 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Simca Ariane.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Simca Ariane. (90 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Simca Ariane.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 1963 Simca Ariane | |
Make | BMW | Simca |
Model | M3 | Ariane |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 90 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.2 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 36 L |