2009 BMW M3 vs. 1965 NSU Autonova
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU Autonova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU Autonova would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 361 more horse power than 1965 NSU Autonova. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1965 NSU Autonova.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 1965 NSU Autonova | |
Make | BMW | NSU |
Model | M3 | Autonova |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1085 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Top Speed | 249 km/hour | 167 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 37 L |