2009 BMW M3 vs. 1966 Ford Consul
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Consul. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Consul would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 369 more horse power than 1966 Ford Consul. (45 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Consul.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (295 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Consul. (85 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Consul.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 1966 Ford Consul | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M3 | Consul |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1181 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 295 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 40 L |